Are you ready? Know the outcome. Invest with confidence.
Cybersecurity leaders, executives, and boards of directors are expected to provide verifiable proof that business assets are protected from the fallout of a potential breach. Lighthouse enables them to optimize investment decisions based on readiness tests and business information not marketing promises.



True Measures of Risk.
Pierce the veil of cybersecurity assumptions. Prove security control readiness and combine with business logic to make decisions with confidence.

Threat Based Cybersecurity. Automated.
Proactively score readiness of cybersecurity systems against most important threats to your mission.

Confident Investment Decisions.
Finally, determining Cyber ROI is now possible. Leadership can invest and divest with confidence based on empiric evidence of readiness.

Map Results to Leading Reporting Frameworks.
Automate results to provide empiric evidence for NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, ATT&CK, CMMC, DoDCAR, govCAR, etc.
What Makes Lighthouse So Powerful
Prove Outcomes Against Advanced Threats.
Identify which controls work, what technologies are contributing to readiness, and where gaps remain across the threat landscape.
Identifies effectiveness of prevention, detection, and response alerting
Battle Station subscribers can measure response actions
Standardized on MITRE ATT&CK framework
The State of the Industry
According to the Ponemon institute, typical U.S. based companies are spending an average of $18.4M on cybersecurity, but data breaches still happen. Further, 53% of IT security practitioners admit they don’t know how well the cybersecurity tools they deployed are working. Ignorance is not bliss as the 2020 FireEye Effectiveness stats show average security controls are dramatically underperforming.
-
33%
-
26%
-
Only 9%
"In God we trust, all others bring data."
W. Edwards Deming
Threat Based Cybersecurity Portfolio Review — Automated!
Base investment decisions on readiness data rather than perceived risk
Identify best Return on Investment to reduce operational risk
Automate DoDCAR and govCAR
Prioritize readiness gaps using threat intelligence tailored to your organization


Balance Security Readiness With Operational Impact
There are a lot factors that can influence security investment decisions. Lighthouse can show the optimal balance between mission, threat, and budget.
Validate the security of individual systems and network segments
Prove the security readiness of your most important systems
Balance the cyber risk associated for most critical assets and missions
Report and Analyze Readiness Across Your Ecosystem
Large organizations may have many networks and suppliers. In today’s connected world, it’s important to understand the readiness of these connected enclaves. The Port Authority module allows you to apply the same methodology across your ecosystem.
Validate the security of individual systems and connected network segments
Prove the security readiness of your most important systems
Balance the cyber risk associated for most critical assets and missions

Do you have questions about Lighthouse?
Our customer support team is eager to answer all your questions about how Lighthouse can help your cybersecurity program succeed.
Want to learn more?
Download a free case study and see how we improve cybersecurity readiness up to 300%!
Additional Features
Outcome Based Guidance
- Adaptive guidance for analysts
- Business cases analysis
- Optimize your solutions for mission & budget
- Identify which technologies are providing value
- Benchmark industry & company security readiness
Advanced Testing Capabilities
- Test, train, & improve AI/ML defenses
- Conduct cybersecurity product bake-offs
- Rapidly test and protect against new threats
- Utilize real malicious code to test solution
- Execute robust what-if scenarios
Continuous Evaluation and Assessment
- Schedule evaluations daily, weekly, monthly, etc.
- Show trends in people, process & tech performance
- Report system status across the ecosystem
- Dynamic recommendations based on results
- Track currency and completeness of tests